Monday, 9 September 2013

The Coalition: A Pan-Canadian Coalition on Problematic Boats, Environmental Protection and a New Legislative Framework

If you care about our lakes and rivers, some of Canada's most valued treasures, then this article is likely to be of interest of you.

All across Canada, Canadian communities, mostly small, face great difficulties in trying to establish regulations regarding the protection of navigable waters environments, that is, waters which fall under federal regulatory jurisdiction - The Canadian Shipping Act, in particular.   Not only are these communities paralysed in efforts to address the growing numbers of motorized boats on waterways, but they also find themselves helpless to deal with the proliferation of "Hummer" type boats, or wake boats, with their 330HP to 550 HP and their destructive and high and powerful waves that generate shoreline erosion, damage docks,  make non-motorized boating unpleasant and disturb shoreline enjoyment.
Unfortunately, The Canadian Shipping Act is an inefficient tool to address the aforementioned challenges because the Act, which dates back to the early years of Canada, was not conceived to protect the environment.  More precisely, the prime purpose of the Act is to protect the rights of navigators, and minimize the barriers to navigation. 

But the worst part about this Act is that it makes it exceptionally difficult for a local government to obtain federal approval for a new regulatory proposal -- up to 5 years from the time a request is made to the moment when a proposal may be approved -- and the guidelines on the Act make it abundantly clear that the federal government seeks non-regulatory solutions by way of voluntary codes of conduct. 
The aforementioned latter point is the source of eternal conflicts within communities in that a community must reach nearly 100% voluntary adherence to a proposed code of conduct.  Surveys and referendums are not regarded by Transport Canada as a basis for a community to formulate a new regulatory proposal.

Consequently, most communities are not able to follow through to achieve federal regulatory approval.  
It is against this legislative backdrop that the matter of the proliferation of wake boats on Canadian waterways has contributed to community dialogues of the deaf over unresolvable conflicts. 

As alluded to in the introduction to this article, wake boats are not at all like conventional motor boats. The combination of 1) horsepower ranges similar to those offered for Volvo tractor-trailer trucks and 2) ballasts ranging from 1500 to 2000 lbs, produce high and powerful waves, even at modest speeds.  As if this is not enough, the turbidity caused by wake boats can go down to a depth of 9 metres and suspend churned up sediments for up to 24 hours after the wake boat has passed.  In turn, the cocktails of floating sediments stemming from shoreline erosion and turbidity contribute to green and blue algae.
As for fuel consumption, there aren't any third independent party ratings available.  However, comments posted on the Net offer figures ranging from 20 litres to 70 litres for one hour's use.  So much for climate change!!!!!

To address the increasing environmental challenges posed by powerful boats, the Canadian Coalition on problematic boats, otherwise known as The Coalition, was officially created on September 1st in a small Quebec community, St-Faustin-Lac-Carré, Québec.
In effect, the Coalition wishes to see modifications of two pieces of legislation, the Canadian Fisheries Act and the Canadian Shipping Act. 

With regard to The Fisheries Act, prior to the Harper administration's changes to this Act, the Act was a very effective tool to protect marine life habitats.  But in response to a request from the pipeline industry, the Conservatives considerably weakened the protection of the marine habitat.
Accordingly, The Coalition objectives entail the modification of both the Canadian Shipping Act and the Canadian Fisheries Act, plus the linking of the two Acts, in order to make it possible to impose restrictions on certain types of boats based on impacts on the marine environment and community decisions.  Clear national environmental criteria and local government authorities would be the pillars of the new legislative framework and the concept of voluntary codes of conduct would be abolished.

Of course, to be politically realistic, The Coalition does not have any hopes with the current government. In this regard, it proposes an interregional and interprovincial Coalition to formulate innovative legislative recommendations for the next federal government, in 2015.
As for the rationale for the interregional and interprovincial approach, it is a reflection of the fact that a small community acting on its own cannot hope to have sufficient influence to request a change to two Acts and the linking of the two.  By contrast, a pan-Canadian Coalition would be hard for any future government to ignore.

In brief, a pan-Canadian Coalition with a two year time line is both politically and logistically sound.
An online signature document and a website to provide Coalition info and updates will be set up shortly.

In the interim, I invite citizens' associations, individuals, municipal councillors, regional governments and others to write to me about their interest at willdubitsky@yahoo.ca.

Wednesday, 21 August 2013

Coalition + Wakeboats: Pétition + Signatures

Coalition sur les modifications de l'encadrement législatif fédéral gouvernant la navigation:
les bateaux qui ont des impacts sur l'environnement tel que les wakeboats.

Étant donné que certains types des bateaux ont des impacts destructifs sur l'environnement des lacs et rivières, tel que l'impact des wakeboats sur l'érosion des bords riverains
Étant donné que les lois fédéraux qui encadrent les eaux navigables rendent difficiles ou presque impossible d'imposer des restrictions sur certains types de bateaux quant à leur impact sur l'environnement et la tranquillité des riverains

Étant donné que le gouvernement fédéral actuel n'est pas suffisamment soucieux de l'environnement pour être réceptif aux changements de lois et règlements de navigation nécessaire pour de protéger l'environnement de nos lacs et rivières
Étant donné qu'une seul municipalité ne pourrait avoir assez d'influence pour agir seule pour changer l'encadrement législatif gouvernant les eaux navigables

Nous les signataires ci-dessous voulons participer dans une coalition inter-municipale, interrégional et interprovincial - un front commun - tel que la prochaine gouvernement fédéral, après l'élection du 2015,  ne pourrait ignorer nos propositions pour un nouvelle encadrement législatif innovateur et efficace qui nous donnerions des outils d’imposer des restrictions sur certains types de bateaux au nom de la protection de l'environnement et de la tranquillité des environs.

Nom                                                          adresse de courriel                                                         municipalité

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Coaliton and Wakeboats: Meeting @10:00AM, Sept 1, 2013 @St-Faustin-LacCarré

Hello:

The purpose of the message is to invite you a first meeting concerning 1) the Coalition on the modification of the federal legislative framework for navigation on our waterways and 2) boats having significant environmental impacts as is the case with wakeboats.  This meeting will take place at 10:00AM, September 1st at the Parc Écotouristique, Collège Vanier, à  737, rue de la Pisciculture, St-Faustin-Lac Carré (the former fish hatchery site).
In brief, the Coalition's objective is to form an inter-municipal, inter-regional and inter-provincial group to develop innovative legislative recommendations between now and the next federal election in 2015.  These recommendations would modify the Canadian Shipping Act and the Fisheries Act and link the two Acts in such a way that, in the name of protection the marine habitat, it would be possible to impose restrictions on the use of certain types of boats.

This approach is based on the following:
1) The Canadian Shipping Act in its present form is inefficient and ineffective for regulating certain types of boating activity based environmental reasons since a) the primary purpose of the Act is to protect navigation rights and b) it takes up to 5 years from the moment a municipality makes a request for a new regulation and the approval of the regulation, plus a trail voluntary code of conduct must be attempted during the 5 year period;

2) The current government has removed the component of The Fisheries Act that protects the marine habitat;
3) Given the environmental policies of the current government, it is best to adopt a time line for targeting the next federal government in 2015;

4) A small municipality, community on its own, cannot hope to get the attention of the Government of Canada to modify legislation, especially when the modifications include the linking of two Acts.  Accordingly, the inter-municipal, inter-regional and inter-provincial approach is proposed as it would be difficult to ignore such a group.  To this end, the Coalition will be targeting other communities and stakeholders in Quebec as well as in other provinces.
Your comments and expressions of interests are most welcome.
Please confirm your presence by e-mail by August 27th.

Regards.

Will Dubitsky                                                                      Rémi Cloutier
willdubitsky@yahoo.ca                                                    remipcloutier@msn.com

La Coalition et les Wakeboats: Rencontre @10h00, 1er sept @St-Faustin-Lac-Carré

Bonjour,

Le but de ce message est de vous inviter à participer à une première rencontre de la Coalition sur 1) les modifications de l'encadrement législatif gouvernant la navigation sur nos lacs et 2) les bateaux qui ont des impacts significatifs sur l'environnement tel que les wakeboats.  La rencontre aura lieu à 10h00 le premier septembre 2013 au Parc Écotouristique, Collège Vanier, à  737, rue de la Pisciculture, St-Faustin-Lac Carré (L'ancienne site de la Pisciculture).
En bref, la Coalition se donne pour objectif de former un front commun inter-municipal, interrégional et interprovincial, avec un échéancier d'ici la prochaine élection fédérale en 2015, en vue de  faire des recommandations législatives innovatrices. Ces recommandations viseront à modifier la Loi sur la marine marchande et la Loi sur la Pêche et lier ces deux lois pour nous permettre, au nom de la protection de l'habitat marin, d’imposer des restrictions sur certains types de bateaux qui sont nuisibles à l'environnement.

 Cette approche s'inspire des points suivants:
1) La Loi sur la marine marchande telle qu'elle existe actuellement est inefficace pour imposer des restrictions sur les bateaux de plaisance au nom de l'environnement puisque a) sa raison d’être est de protéger les droits des navigateurs, et b) qu'il y a un délai d’environ cinq ans entre la demande d'une municipalité pour un changement de règlements et une approbation, le tout exigeant une période d’essai avec code de conduite pendant cette période;

2) Le gouvernement actuel a éliminé la protection de l’habitat marin contenu anciennement dans la Loi sur la Pêche;
 3) En tenant compte des politiques actuelles, il faut attendre la venue d'un nouveau gouvernement suite aux élections de 2015.

4) Une petite municipalité ne peut par elle-même attirer l'attention du gouvernement fédéral afin de modifier l'encadrement législatif, surtout puisqu’'il s'agit de modifier deux lois.  Par conséquent, nous avons adopté une approche inter-municipale interrégional et interprovincial, une approche de front commun, tel que Le Gouvernement du Canada ne pourrait pas nous ignorer.  À cet effet, nous avons l'intention  d'inclure sous peu d'autres collectivités et intervenants au Québec et dans les autres provinces.
Vos commentaires et/ou  expressions d'intérêts sont les bienvenus.


SVP, confirmez votre présence d'ici le 27 août.

Au plaisir
Will Dubitsky                                                                      Rémi Cloutier
willdubitsky@yahoo.ca                                                    remipcloutier@msn.com

Wednesday, 14 August 2013

The Critical Role of Public Financial Institutions in the Green Economy

Purpose

Both the Intergovernmental Panel and Climate Change and the International Energy Agency have concluded that public policies, rather than the availability of resources, are among the key determinants for a shift from fossil fuels to clean technology development and deployment.  This article is about the role of public banks as critical agents for change along these lines.

The article begins with a review of public financial institutions around the globe that support the development of the clean technology sectors and concludes with options for Canada to build upon these models from elsewhere.

Public Financial Institutions and the Green Economy
Starting with some of the largest public banks, in July 2013, both the World Bank and the European Investment Bank announced that they will limit to the bare minimum, investments in fossil fuel projects, while shifting the lion's share of their respective energy investments to renewables.

World Bank's Jim Yong Kim – the first scientist to head the institution – said it is impossible to tackle poverty without dealing with the effects of a warmer world.  “We need affordable energy to help end poverty and to build shared prosperity. We will also scale-up efforts to increase renewable energy and improve energy efficiency – according to countries’ needs and opportunities.”

Based on perspectives not very different from that of the World Bank, in July 2013, The European Investment Bank (EIB), in line with the current European Union climate policy, announced it will implement new lending criteria that skew heavily towards renewables and screen out nearly all coal and lignite plants.

The significance of the EIB shift is illustrated by the fact that the EIB invests, lends and leverages $13.2B/year for energy initiatives.  The leveraging of EIB investments in turn fosters private financing, especially important for the capital intensive offshore wind sector.  Many offshore wind projects have benefited from the low cost EIB loans in recent years.
 
Also in Europe, in the UK, the Green Investment Bank, headquartered in Glasgow, was created in 2012 with $3.6B (£3B) in initial capital to carry it through until 2015.  Its mission is to respond to the specific financing challenges of commercial green infrastructure projects by tackling the finance gaps which remain despite the advent of new government policies.  Like the EIB, this mission includes leveraging its investments to bring in other lenders and investors.

To raise additional capital, GIB’s capital base is, and will be, regularly reinforced with pollution permit proceeds and the newly announced carbon tax revenues.  Beginning in the 2014-2015 period, bonds will be issued to raise additional capital.
 
Meanwhile in Germany, the state bank, kfw, is backing offshore wind development to the tune of $7.2B (5B€).

With respect to China, the Chinese Development Bank (CDB), has been a key player in making China the world's largest clean tech player.  In 2012, total investments in renewables was $67.7B, compared to its closest rival, the US, with $56B in investments in that same year.
 
The CDB is a formidable player, especially because the CDB appears to have no limits on the billions of dollars with which to work.  About 2 years ago, the CDB committed a whopping $45B over 5 years to smart grid development and deployment.-- Smart grid platforms are the key to the massive integration of intermittent renewable energy production such as energy from wind and solar sources, by storing surplus energy for redeployment, as required.  

More recently, the CDB provided Goldwind, a state-owned wind turbine manufacturer, with $6B to finance international business development.  Similarly, Ming Yang, a smaller Chinese turbine manufacturer, acquired $5B from the CDB for loans and credit facilities between 2011 and 2015 to prepare its way to enter international markets.
 
The aforementioned orders of magnitude of CDB support for China's clean tech sectors have contributed to accusations of global clean tech dumping, specifically, accusations from the US and the European Union.  Both the US and the EU have responded to the alleged dumping by imposing steep tariffs on imports of clean tech products from China.

By way of contrast, Canada has taken on an opposite type of course of action by being oblivious to the problem of dumping of clean techs by China.  To this effect, the proposed Canada-China trade deal stipulates that there will be no commercial barriers applied to environmental technologies.  Evidently, the Harper regime is prepared to give China what it wants, in order for Canada to sell tar sands oil them. -- Either the Harper administration is unaware of the significance of China's request, it simply does not care or a combination of both!
 
Yet another variant of an innovative public financial institution model for supporting domestic clean tech manufacturing, is that of Brazil's Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Economico e Social.  As of Jan. 2013, Banco Nacional requires that wind turbine manufacturers source 60% of components in Brazil and produce or assemble in Brazil at least 3 of the 4 main wind technology components-- towers, blades, nacelles and hubs, between now and 2016.  Under the Banco Nacional model, turbine makers have to meet the staggered manufacturing phases established by the bank, which would be stepped up every six months, until 2016.

Turning to the US, there the US Export-Import Bank, which represents 7 US government agencies, was created to finance renewable energy projects in emerging markets and, most important, support the US clean tech industry with its requirement for 30% US content.  India, one of Bank’s 9 key markets, accounted for approximately $7B of the Bank’s worldwide credit exposure as of the end of FY 2011.  Another example of Ex-Im Bank loans was the $1B credit package to fund wind power development in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, in collaboration with the Vietnam Development Bank.
 
Lastly, there is the pension fund green investment model such as that established by Denmark's Dong Energy.-- Dong is 75% owned by the Government of Denmark and is involved in 30% of all offshore wind projects in the world.  Currently, Dong uses Danish pension funds for its financial activity in offshore wind projects in Denmark and partners with the Japanese trading firm Marubeni for equity financing for projects outside Denmark.

The aforementioned government and pension fund financial and policy connections have translated into Dong being a very special kind of energy investor in that 85% of its current portfolio is associated with fossil fuels and 15% renewables, but its mission is to reverse this ratio by 2040.
 
Canada

With the examples of the World Bank, the European Investment Bank China, the UK Green Investment Bank, Germany's kfw, the Chinese Development Bank, the US' Ex-Im Bank and Brazil's Banco nacional, showing the way to the effect that publicly funded investment institutions can play critical roles in assuring a migration to renewables and clean techs, the question to raise in Canada is as follows:  Why can't Canada do similar things via the Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC) and Export Development Canada?

Indeed these Canadian investment vehicles offer excellent options for the financing the development of Canada's clean tech sectors.  The BDC, like the other institutions mentioned in this article, could leverage its venture capital funds to attract additional support from Canada's private banks and financial cooperatives.  What an excellent way to take on the challenge of reaching US equivalency with regard to 20% of US venture capital activity in 2011 and 2012 represented by investments in the US clean tech sectors.
 
As well, the BDC could take a page from Brazil's Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Economico e Social and include Canadian content requirements, thus assuring optimal benefits for Canadian economic development and job creation.  It is  conceivable that BDC supported local economic development along these lines could fly under the radar of free trade agreements.

As for an approach for supporting Canadian exports of clean technologies, the models described in this article, in particular the Chinese Development Bank and the US Export-Import Bank, are tough acts to follow since these institutions have billions of dollars to work with. 
 
Nevertheless, the fact that the US Ex-Im Bank brings together 7 US national government organizations, suggests this US model could provide some insights for a Made in Canada model.  For example, if the Canadian International Development Agency  would partner with Export Development Canada, the Government of Canada would be able to support the setting up of clean energy micro-grids in isolated communities without necessitating the prohibitively expensive land infrastructure connections to very distant centralized electricity generation plants.  

On the subject of pension fund models, in the previous section, mention was made of Government of Denmark investing pension funds in Dong Energy, a company 75% owned by the Government of Denmark, and planning to reverse its investment ratios, from the current 85% in fossil fuels to 15% renewables, to the very opposite ratio by 2040.
 
Well, as it happens, contrary to what most may think, there are Canadian precedents for major investments of pension funds in clean tech sectors.  That is, in February 2013, the Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, the financial arm for Quebec pension funds, invested $757M to purchase half of Dong Energy's 50% share in the world's largest offshore wind energy project, UK's 850 MW London Array.  Just prior to that, in January 2013, the Caisse purchased $500M in shares of 11 Invenergy wind farms in the US and Canada, representing 1500 MW and including 2 wind projects in Canada, one of which is in Quebec.

This raises a second question.  Why can't the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) create a Canadian clean tech portfolio to support optimal Canadian participation in one of the world's largest growth and job creation sectors, the clean tech sector?
 
From my previous dealings with the CPPIB, I know that the CPPIB answer is that their job is to get the maximum return for pensioners and consequently no particular preference is given for Canadian investments.  This is faulty logic for 2 reasons.  First, it is not unusual for investment vehicles to be associated with more than one objective.  Second, and most important, investments in growth sectors in Canada that offer high paying jobs, would bring additional revenues for the CPPIB in the form of greater contributions from both employers and employees -- in addition to the traditional form of returns on investments.   Indeed, from time-to-time, the Caisse has adopted priorities for investments in Quebec with similar motivations.

Conclusion
In conclusion, 1) innovative clean technology roles for the BDC and EDC to support and leverage venture capital and finance exports and 2) the creation of the clean tech portfolio for the CPPIB, could significantly contribute to Canada's catching up to its competitors in the global migration to the high growth and high job creation green economy, all while making good money in the process.  Earnings from completed projects would in turn finance more projects. -- These are opportunities that make good sense for Canada to embrace.

As Jack Layton used to say, "Don't let them tell you it can't be done."

Will Dubitsky, 14 08 13
willdubitsky@gmail.com

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

Canada Missing Out on Job Creating Green Economy


Introduction

“The real-life global competition over clean energy is growing increasingly intense, as countries around the world sense a huge economic opportunity and the opportunity for cleaner air, water, and a healthier planet.” 

                Former US Energy Secretary Steven Chu May 2012
The current Conservative government wants Canadians to believe that economic development and sustainable development are opposing forces. Consequently, Conservative see their Bills C-38 and C-45, with their draconian anti-environmental components, as justified.  Nothing could be further from the truth.

First, the clean tech sectors are one of the globe's fastest growing and highest job creation sectors.  In 2012, global investments in renewable energy amounted to $268.7B, down from $302.3B in 2011 due to decline in prices and costs; policy uncertainty in the US; and European economic woes. 
China led the way with $67.7B in clean energy investments in 2012, an increase of 20% over the previous year due to a surge in its solar tech sector. The 2012 US, Japan and German investments were $42.2B, $16.3B and $22.8B respectively.

On jobs, the employment to date in these sectors that only a few years ago were nascent sectors are extraordinary.    The global total numbers of jobs in 2011 in clean energy sectors were 5M with China, once again leading the way with 1.6M, followed by Europe with 1.1M and Germany and India with 372,000 and 350,000 respectively.
Canada, as a result of the absence of adequate federal support for being a full participant in this growth misses out on job opportunities by the 1000's every year and the gap between Canada and other developed nations grows yearly.

For a sense of lost employment opportunities for Canadians, the November 2012 report of BlueGreen Canada, an organization that represents unions and environmentalists, indicated that, if the $1.3B in subsidies allocated to the oil and gas sector that currently supports 2,300 jobs in the oil and gas sectors were to be transferred to renewable energy, energy efficiency and public transit, this same amount of money would create 18,000-20,000 jobs in clean energy sectors --- 6 to 8 times more jobs per investment unit.
Behind the aforementioned growth figures, lies the fact that the point of departure for much of this leadership by other nations is government support for innovation.  Specifically, innovation leads to product development and ultimately manufacturing jobs.  However, the Conservative Budget 2013-2014, for the first time in over 40 years, did not assign any financing for clean tech innovation, zero!

To catch up, Canada's requires a highly aggressive climate change action plan that includes substantive fiscal, legislative, program and research components for immediate implementation after the next federal election in 2015.  Put another way, Canada's catching up to the rest of the world should not be principally that of a dependency on importations clean techs, and the sacrificing of the potential for domestic clean tech innovation and manufacturing in Canada.

China
In 2009, China became the largest single energy consumer in the world, putting the US in second place.   But since then, China  has also become the largest clean energy market in the world and a leader in the manufacturing of clean technologies for both domestic and international markets.
While thermal coal-fired generating plants) continued to dominate new installations of electrical power generation, with 50.7 GW in 2012, wind energy came in second with a record 13.2 GW added in 2012.  Total 2012 installed wind capacity was 67.7 GW and the installed projections are for 2020 are 200 GW. (Note, for comparative purposes, Quebec's total electricity capacity is 37 GW not including Churchill).

From the 150,000 jobs in the Chinese wind sector in 2009, the projections for 2020 in this sector are 500,000 jobs.
With respect to solar energy, there are 14 GW in the pipeline.  There were 300,000 who worked in the photovoltaic sector and  800,000 employed in solar heating/cooling in 2011.  Projections  for total installed solar capacity for 2020 are in the order of 50 GW.

 The US
The US is the second largest clean tech market and consequently its energy portrait is changing very quickly.  Wind was the largest new source of electrical power generation in 2012 with 13.1 GW of new installations bringing the total US installed capacity to 60 GW.

This US migration to a green economy was kick-started with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) which pumped $70B into the green economy, including major investments in innovation, during the 2009 to 2011 period, the first half of the first Obama mandate.  Grants, tax credits loans, loan guarantees and investments in research were among the principle mechanisms applied during the 2009-2011 period. Republicans have since put the brakes on this, nevertheless a strong momentum has been established.

There are about 75,000 people working in the US wind sector and over 500 facilities manufacturing turbine components. There were about 119,000 jobs in the US solar in 2012, a 13% increase over 2011 and the biomass and geothermal sectors provided 152,000 and 10,000 jobs respectively in 2011.   When one adds the sum of the various parts of the renewable energy sectors, renewable energy capacity in the US doubled in the 5 years from 2008 to 2012.

Meanwhile in parallel, between 2007 and 2012, oil consumption as a percentage of total US energy consumption,  dropped from 39.3% to 36.7%. As well, the consumption of coal has dropped from 22.5% of total US energy consumption in 2007 to 18.1% in 2012. 

The impacts of the above-mentioned factors combined with investments in energy efficiency by power utilities and improved average fuel consumption of US vehicles, have resulted in a 13% drop in US CO2 emissions from 2007 to 2012.

In his late June 2013 statement on new actions on climate Change, President Obama announced an objective of a reduction of 3B metric tons by 2030.  Unfortunately, the new support proposed for clean energy in his pronouncements were very modest.  

The good news is that President Obama June 2013 announcement stated that the process for approving clean energy production and distribution on federal lands would be accelerated.  This is good because federal lands represent 20% of the US continental land mass.  The bad news is the June 2013 proposals are in effect an accelerated version a Department of the Interior mandate assigned during the ARRA 2009-2011 period.  No details have been provided as to the nature of initiatives to speed up DOI approvals.

Disappointing in the June 2013 action plan, is the lion's share of new funding, $8B, is to be allocated to technologies to reduce fossil fuel emissions, in particular to support carbon capture and storage technologies (CCS).  CCS technologies are prohibitively expensive and consume enormous amounts of energy while only offering modest carbon reduction.

Short time line extensions from the ARRA days are 1) the Investment Tax Credit of 30% on investments, primarily applied for the construction of solar farms and 2) the Production Tax Credit of 2.2 cents/kWh used mainly by wind farm developers.


Europe

In Europe, renewable energy represented 69% of new electrical power capacity installed in 2012 while the oil, coal and nuclear sectors experienced negative growth.  

There were 11.6 GW of wind power installed in 2012 bringing the total installed capacity in 2012 to 105.6 GW.  Wind is expected to reach 136.5 GW by 2014 and 230 GW of installed capacity by 2020. 
Solar installations surpassed wind in 2012 with 21 GW of installations representing one quarter of 2012 global solar installations in that year.

This rapid growth of the European renewable sectors is generating rapid growth in employment in these sectors.  From 192,000 jobs in Europe's wind sector in 2009, the European Wind Energy Association (EWEA)  is predicting  280,000 jobs in 2015 and 450,000 by 2020.  So quickly is the industry growing that despite the exceptionally high unemployment in many parts of Europe, the EWEA estimates that the industry will experience a skilled labour shortage of 5500 jobs/year.
Germany is a leader among European nations with about 372,000 jobs in its renewable energy sectors for the year 2011.  That's bigger than the German auto sector.  By 2020, the projections are for 400,000 to 500,000 employed in the renewable sectors.  

In parallel, Germany's nuclear sector is on the way out, a consequence of the Fukushima crisis.  Germany has shut down 8 of its nuclear plants and intends to shut down the remaining 9 by 2022.

Germany's installed wind capacity was 31.3 GW in 2012, representing 30% of the European Union total. It's installed capacity of solar energy in 2012 reached 32 GW making it the second largest solar market in the world after China.  With respect to its renewables targets for the percentage of total energy consumption by 2020 (total energy consumption including the transportation sector) , Germany has a higher target than the 20% target of the European Union.  Germany is going for 35% target and offshore wind will play a major role in pursuing this target. To this end, the German development bank, kfw will be backing offshore wind development with $7.2B (€5B) in financing.


Conclusion
The US, Europe, China and other developed nations are well-engaged in the migration to a green economy -- from supporting domestic innovation; to the construction of green technology manufacturing plants; to the development of clean energy production sites; and more generally, to the expansion of national and international markets. 

These developments continue to give rise to the creation of jobs by the thousands in most regions of the developed world - with the exception of Canada.  They also offer hope for developing countries where more than 50% of the global potential for renewable energy power production exists. 
Conversely, all the evidence indicates that the old model, the fossil fuel-based economy, no longer makes sense.  The old model not only requires massive dependencies on importing energy and the resulting exportation of ,and concentration of, energy wealth, but it is also not good for the planet.  Surely a healthy economy cannot exist in a planet that cannot sustain healthy life.

For at least the next 2 and a half years until the federal election of 2015, Canada will largely miss out on the global green economy opportunities both in terms of spreading the energy related wealth across the country and in terms of green technology market possibilities, domestic and export markets alike.  Perhaps more important, under the present circumstances, Canadian innovation capabilities cannot be adequately supported to keep pace with the rest of the world and ultimately offer Canada high-job creating manufacturing and export opportunities.
In a recent special report on renewables to the United Nations, the International Panel on Climate Change concluded that public policies, rather than the availability of the resource, are the key determinants regarding expansion or constraints to renewable energy development/deployment. In it's June 2013 report, the International Energy Agency came to similar conclusions and added that uncertainty about renewable policies may hamper investment and growth.

In other words the extent to which ,nations benefit from the high job-creating clean tech sectors while reducing emissions, is a matter of political will.  There certainly are no lack of possiblities for those who choose to be a part of the solution in light of the fact that  less than 2.5% of the globally available technical potential for renewables is currently exploited— over 97 % is untapped. 

Indeed, the technical potential of renewable energy technologies exceeds the current global energy demand by a considerable amount.  As well, the prices of clean technologies have declined considerably.

Will Dubitsky, July 10, 2013
willdubitsky@gmail.com

Friday, 5 July 2013

WARNING, PMO False + Misleading Info: EcoEnergy Innovation Initiative

Here is an excellent example of false and misleading info straight from the Prime Minister's Office regarding the EcoEnergy Innovation Initiative, and Government of Canada investments in clean tech in general.
 
First, the EcoEnergy Innovation Initiative call for statements of interest came in the form of regional launchings across Canada in September 2011. The deadline for submissions of statements of interest for one part of the program was just two weeks after the launchings, the second part in mid-October 2011.
 
While those who have had their projects approved were advised to this effect 2 years ago, the Prime Minister made the official announcement on approved projects May 3, 2013, to purposely mislead the public to the effect that the government is doing something now.  http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=5460 BUT THERE IS NO NEW FUNDING FOR CLEAN TECH INNOVATION IN 2013-2014, ZERO! 
 
Note as well, that 30% of the EcoEnergy Innovation Initiative funding awarded-- $24.942M out of the total $82M --- went to carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies, the green washing technologies to make it appear that the fossil fuel industry has the environment at heart. Also $8.826M or 11% of all funding went to tar sands projects.
 
As for the merits of CCS, the article for which the link follows, states that 1) one third of the energy produced by a pilot CCS application to a coal-fired generating unit of the Boundary Dam facility in SK is necessary to run the CCS component and 2) TranAlta, despite $800M in funding from Ottawa, abandoned it CCS project in Pioneer, AB. http://www.lapresse.ca/environnement/dossiers/changements-climatiques/201306/29/01-4666247-une-centrale-thermique-pionniere-dans-la-captation-du-carbone.php
 
Further on recent investments in clean tech, note that:
1) Sustainable Development Technology Canada, which averaged $56.4M/year in investments in clean tech innovation in the past, was allocated in the last Budget only $1M for 2013-2014 and $12M for 2014-2015;.
2) Obama recently announced an increase in clean tech research funding by 30% to reach $7.9B and an acceleration of the permitting approval process for renewable energy production and distribution projects on federal lands - federal lands make up 20% of the continental US land mass;
3) in August 2012, the Government of China announced financial commitments up to the year 2015 in the amount of $372B for emissions and pollution reductions and energy efficiency. http://www.ibtimes.com/china-spend-372-billion-reduce-pollution-encourage-energy-efficiency-759575 This complements the $67.7B in investments in clean techs in China for the year 2012; and
4) the global totals for clean tech investments in 2011 and 2012 respectively were $302.3B and $268.7B, the drop in investments in 2012 in part a reflection of the decline in clean tech prices, policy uncertainty in the US and European economic woes.
 
Will Dubitsky, July 5, 2013